Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-58293
Under investigationA regulator, court or police has opened a formal inquiry and reached no finding yet.

Finland's Parliamentary Ombudsman Investigates AI Replacing Municipal Leadership

Humppila municipality in Finland replaced administrative director and technical director positions with AI systems to achieve budget savings. The Parliamentary Ombudsman opened an investigation to examine whether the municipality can use AI for government decision-making while protecting fundamental rights, ensuring legal procedures, and maintaining official accountability.

28 September 2026 · Humppila municipality · Governance, accountability and labour
28 September 2026
AII-1000-582937 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Governance, accountability and labour
Country
Finland
Source
Forssan Lehti
Date
28 September 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Humppila municipality in Central Finland eliminated the administrative director and technical director positions and replaced their functions with AI systems. The municipal council approved the move following a proposal from new municipal manager Minna Ylikännö, with the stated goal of achieving 150,000 euros in budget savings.

The AI system was deployed to draft administrative decisions, public procurement documents, and administrative regulations. Ylikännö reported using AI to complete administrative rule revisions in one day.

Reported impact

The Parliamentary Ombudsman's office opened an investigation to examine the lawfulness and governance implications of using AI for municipal government functions. The investigation examined what tasks were assigned to AI, how decision-making legality and proper procedures are ensured, and how AI use affects public authority responsibility.

The ombudsman raised questions about how fundamental rights, good governance, and official accountability are secured when AI performs government functions. The municipality subsequently clarified that its primary goal was not to expand AI use or reduce administration, but to maintain essential public services.

Index analysis

The case represents a novel application of generative AI to core government decision-making and administrative rule-making. The ombudsman found the case raised questions about how legality oversight and proper procedures can be maintained when AI systems perform official duties.

Governance controls

The municipality did not disclose that governance controls were in place before deploying AI to decision-making and rule-writing functions. The ombudsman's investigation specifically examined whether controls exist to ensure lawful decision-making and proper handling of administrative tasks.

Classification

Category
Governance, accountability and labour
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
Finland
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
Workers, Government
Consequences
Regulatory investigation
AI systems
Unnamed generative AI system
Regulations
EU AI Act (investigation)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Forssan Lehti
Kunta kertoi korvanneensa kaksi johtajavirkaa tekoälyllä - apulaisoikeusasiamies aloitti selvityksen
28 September 2026
Helsingin Sanomat
Tekoäly | Apulaisoikeusasiamies selvittää, miten kunta voi käyttää tekoälyä
28 September 2026
Ilta-Sanomat
Viranomainen selvittää: Humppilan kunnassa kaksi johtajavirkaa korvattiin tekoälyllä
28 September 2026
Maaseudun Tulevaisuus
Humppila korvasi kaksi johtajavirkaa tekoälyllä - apulaisoikeusasiamies aloitti selvityksen
28 September 2026
SSS.fi
Apulaisoikeusasiamies selvittää tekoälyn käyttöä viranomaistehtävissä
28 September 2026
Tivi
Apulaisoikeusasiamies otti tekoälyn käytön kunnissa tutkittavaksi
28 September 2026
Yle.fi
Apulaisoikeusasiamies selvittää tekoälyn käyttöä kunnissa
28 September 2026