Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-49353
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Figma sued for using customer data to train AI without consent

Figma was hit with a proposed class action lawsuit in California federal court alleging the company used customers' designs and intellectual property to train generative AI models without permission, despite prior promises not to use customer data for its own purposes.

21 November 2025 Β· Figma Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
21 November 2025
AII-1001-49353
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
United States
Date
21 November 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A proposed class action was filed in US District Court for the Northern District of California on Friday alleging that Figma trained its generative AI models on proprietary data that its millions of users uploaded to the platform.

According to the lawsuit, Figma automatically opted users into allowing the company to use their data to train its AI software without informing them or receiving permission.

The lawsuit alleged that Figma contradicted prior promises made over the years not to use consumer data for its own purposes, including to train AI models.

Reported impact

The lawsuit alleged that the value of Figma users' intellectual property is "reasonably measured in the tens or hundreds of billions of dollars."

Figma's use of customer data reportedly led to San Francisco-based Figma's "sky-high valuation" in a $1.2 billion initial public offering earlier this year.

Index analysis

The lawsuit alleged the company stole customer trade secrets and illegally accessed their data, focusing on claims different from typical copyright infringement cases brought against tech companies over use of content to train AI systems.

Figma stated it does not use any customer data to train models without explicit authorization, and that even with authorization, it takes additional steps to de-identify data and protect customer privacy.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Consumer services
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Reputational
Harmed
Business, Consumers
Failure modes
Training data misuse
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
Figma generative AI models

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident