Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-65373
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Dutch councilor excluded after AI-retouched campaign photo controversy

A Dutch city councilor was excluded from her political party after using AI-retouched campaign photos that made her appear younger and differed significantly from official images. The controversy also revealed she did not reside in the district she was elected to represent.

31 March 2026 Β· Patricia Reichman Β· Misinformation and synthetic media
31 March 2026
AII-1000-65373
Quick facts
Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Country
Netherlands
Date
31 March 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Patricia Reichman, a 59-year-old elected to a district council seat in Rotterdam in late March 2026, distributed a campaign photo that had been heavily retouched using AI. The photo made her appear significantly younger than in her official candidate photo, with differences including eye color.

When questioned by media, Reichman stated she had used online software to increase the resolution of a low-quality original image and attributed appearance differences to medical treatment and her naturally youthful appearance. Her party Leefbaar Rotterdam stated the photo was clearly heavily retouched with AI and did not represent reality.

Reported impact

The party discovered Reichman did not reside in the district for which she had been elected, contrary to claims she made during the candidacy process. Leefbaar Rotterdam requested she return her seat; she did not comply.

Index analysis

The incident involved use of AI image retouching software for campaign materials. Reichman's explanation that she had only enhanced resolution was contradicted by her party's assessment that the photo showed excessive AI retouching.

Governance controls

Leefbaar Rotterdam excluded Reichman from the party, citing both the misleading photo and her false residency claims. The party stated it could not continue a relationship based on trust when provided information proved inaccurate.

Classification

Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Netherlands
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Public interest, Reputational
Harmed
General public
Failure modes
Deepfake image, Manipulation or dark pattern
AI systems
Online image retouching software

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident