Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-58637
AllegedThe record is a lawsuit, complaint or accusation that has not been decided.

Disney, Universal sue Midjourney for copyright infringement in AI training

Disney and Universal Studios filed a lawsuit against Midjourney alleging it trained its AI image generator on millions of copyrighted works including Marvel superheroes, Star Wars characters, Shrek, and Minions without permission, then allowed users to generate infringing derivative images. The studios claim Midjourney profited through subscriptions while ignoring previous warnings about the copyright violations.

June 2025 Β· Midjourney Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
June 2025
AII-1002-586375 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
United States
Source
dockets.justia.com
Date
June 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Midjourney allegedly trained its AI model using an immense quantity of copyrighted works, including Disney's Marvel superheroes, Star Wars characters, and Universal's Shrek and Minions, without obtaining permission. The company then allowed users to generate images that closely replicate these iconic characters, profiting through subscriptions and distribution of unauthorised derivative works.

Disney and Universal filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Los Angeles providing examples of Midjourney-generated images that included Star Wars' Yoda and Darth Vader, Marvel's Spiderman, the Incredible Hulk, Iron Man, Frozen's Elsa, and the Minions from Despicable Me.

Reported impact

The studios allege this has potentially harmed their intellectual property rights, brand value, and revenue streams by enabling widespread reproduction without licensing or control. Midjourney made $300m last year alone and is planning a soon-to-be-released video service.

Index analysis

A legal precedent in this case could shape the future boundaries of AI-generated content and copyright enforcement, impacting artists, companies, and consumers. Copyright law recognizes that creativity can build on other works as long as it adds something new, but some legal experts suggest that Midjourney-generated images do not appear to be transformed in a creative or imaginative way.

Several issues including terms of service provisions by Midjourney and basic fair use analysis will need to be sorted out by the court before the likely outcome can be determined.

Governance controls

Midjourney's actions exemplify a 'copyright free-rider' secretly exploiting existing creative works for commercial gain without proper licensing. The studios allege previous warnings were ignored, compelling legal action to enforce their IP rights.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Arts, entertainment and recreation
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Training data misuse
Consequences
Litigation
AI systems
Midjourney
Regulations
FCRA (cited)

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

dockets.justia.com
Disney, Universal sue Midjourney for copyright infringement in AI training
bbc.co.uk
Disney, Universal sue Midjourney for copyright infringement in AI training
npr.org
Disney, Universal sue Midjourney for copyright infringement in AI training
nytimes.com
Disney, Universal sue Midjourney for copyright infringement in AI training
variety.com
Disney, Universal sue Midjourney for copyright infringement in AI training