Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-62331
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Delhi High Court orders removal of deepfake content against Patanjali co-founder

Acharya Balkrishna, co-founder of Patanjali Ayurved, sued to protect his personality rights after deepfake videos were created and circulated online. The Delhi High Court issued an interim order directing removal of defamatory social media content, but declined a blanket takedown and required specific identification of violating material.

24 March 2026 Β· Delhi High Court Β· Misinformation and synthetic media
24 March 2026
AII-1000-623313 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Country
India
Source
Asianet News Network Pvt Ltd
Date
24 March 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Acharya Balkrishna, co-founder and managing director of Patanjali Ayurved, filed a suit in Delhi High Court against the misuse of his identity through deepfake technology. The suit named Ashok Kumar (described as a fictitious name) and other unknown parties for allegedly creating or circulating manipulated digital content.

On March 24, 2026, Justice Tushar Rao Gedela passed an interim order protecting Balkrishna's personality rights and directing the removal of vulgar, defamatory and insulting social media content against him. The court declined to issue a blanket takedown order, instead requiring Balkrishna to provide a specific list of violating content.

Reported impact

Balkrishna claimed that fake and edited videos circulating online can mislead people and harm his reputation. He stated that such content may confuse viewers, especially those in rural areas who may not easily identify fake digital material.

Index analysis

The case reflects increasing judicial scrutiny of deepfake technology and its potential misuse, particularly in relation to public figures. The court observed that a public figure must tolerate criticism, satire and commentary, and cannot obtain blanket orders to remove content without examining specific instances.

Governance controls

The interim order directed the removal of defamatory and vulgar social media content while recognizing the limits of content removal for public figures. The court asked the plaintiff to narrow down his request and provide specific instances of violating content rather than making broad removal demands.

Classification

Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
India
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Reputational, Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Deepfake video
Consequences
Content removal, Litigation

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Asianet News Network Pvt Ltd
Delhi HC to hear Acharya Balkrishna's suit against deepfake misuse
22 March 2026
Asian News International (ANI)
Delhi HC to hear Acharya Balkrishna's plea on personality rights, deepfake misuse
22 March 2026
newKerala.com
Delhi HC Orders Removal of Defamatory Content Against Balkrishna
24 March 2026
Jul 2026Delhi High Court Orders Removal of AI Deepfakes Targeting Yuvraj SinghConfirmedMisinformation and synthetic mediaThe PioneerEconomic TimesTelangana Today+4Jul 2026Delhi High Court Orders Removal of AI-Generated Deepfake Content Targeting MP Raghav ChadhaConfirmedMisinformation and synthetic mediaThe HinduEconomic TimesMay 2026Delhi High Court Grants Varun Dhawan Interim Relief Against AI-Generated DeepfakesConfirmedMisinformation and synthetic mediaThe Times of IndiaNDTVKalingaTV+4May 2026Naga Chaitanya Seeks Delhi High Court Protection Against Deepfakes and Identity MisuseAllegedMisinformation and synthetic mediaThe Indian ExpressDeccan ChronicleHindustan Times+4May 2026Delhi High Court Orders Removal of AI-Generated Deepfakes Targeting Indian ActorsConfirmedMisinformation and synthetic mediaTelangana TodayHindustan Times