Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-56133
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.

DeepSeek AI generates sexual content despite safety controls and fabricates research citations

DeepSeek's content filters can reportedly be circumvented through prompt engineering techniques to generate explicit sexual text, and the system has been found to fabricate academic citations including non-existent papers and incorrect DOI numbers when asked to provide research sources.

13 September 2026 · DeepSeek · Harmful and abusive content
13 September 2026
AII-1000-561332 sources ↓
Quick facts
Organization
DeepSeek (subject)
Category
Harmful and abusive content
Country
China
Source
中华网科技公司
Date
13 September 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A reporter from the Jinan Daily tested instructions circulating online that claim to bypass DeepSeek's content filters. On September 13, after initial rejection, the reporter was able to guide the system to generate explicit sexual text through role-playing, long text prompts, and segment-based instructions.

Instructions for bypassing content restrictions were found sold for one yuan on the secondhand platform Xianyu and shared in social media groups with around 500 members. The Xianyu customer service acknowledged that selling such tutorials violates platform rules but cited limitations in detection capacity.

A health content creator discovered that when using DeepSeek to write about chewing and cognitive aging, the system provided research data and citation sources that could not be verified through academic databases. When asked for original English papers, DeepSeek provided titles and DOI numbers, but further searches showed some titles do not exist and some DOIs correspond to entirely different papers.

Reported impact

The ability to bypass content filters raises concerns about the effectiveness of AI safety measures. The incidents demonstrate risks of unverified content generation in fields such as health education, where false information could spread further if creators package AI output as scientific conclusions.

Index analysis

These failures reveal dual weaknesses: moderation systems that can be circumvented through prompt engineering, and a hallucination tendency where the system generates plausible but fabricated academic citations complete with false DOI numbers and non-existent paper titles.

Governance controls

DeepSeek had previously removed an 'Expert Mode' in response to earlier content safety concerns. The Chinese Cyberspace Administration had launched a special action to address AI-generated violent and vulgar content and violations of minors' rights.

Classification

Organization
DeepSeek (subject)
Category
Harmful and abusive content
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
China
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Public interest
Harmed
General public, Consumers
Failure modes
Content moderation failure, Hallucination, Fabricated citation, Prompt injection, Jailbreak, Manipulation or dark pattern, Agent misaction
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
DeepSeek

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

中华网科技公司
平台1元卖DeepSeek涉黄教程 违规内容仍可生成
17 September 2026
The Epoch Times
DeepSeek再陷风波 被曝仍可生成涉黄内容
17 September 2026