Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-13811
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

Court Rules AI Voice Clone of German Actor's Dub Voice Infringes Rights

A German court ruled that a YouTuber unlawfully used AI voice cloning software to impersonate voice actor Manfred Lehmann without consent, creating synthetic narration for right-wing political videos linked to an online shop. The court found the use infringed Lehmann's personality rights and ordered the YouTuber to pay 4,000 euros as a fictional license fee.

3 September 2025 Β· Landgericht Berlin II Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
3 September 2025
AII-1002-13811
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
Germany
Date
3 September 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A YouTuber used AI voice cloning software to generate a synthetic copy of Manfred Lehmann's voice without his knowledge or consent and used it to narrate several videos with politically right-wing content.

The cloned voice was deployed to increase reach and drive sales for a linked online shop, with no disclosure that the narration was AI-generated.

Reported impact

The court found the use of the cloned voice created a false impression that Lehmann had endorsed the political content, which the court deemed particularly problematic in a political context.

Index analysis

The YouTuber argued he had simply sought a voice with a 'heroic sound' and used a variant suggested by the software, and invoked artistic and free speech rights. The court rejected these arguments, finding that personality rights took precedence over artistic or speech freedoms in this case, especially because the AI origin was not disclosed.

Governance controls

Landgericht Berlin II ordered the YouTuber to cease unauthorized use of the cloned voice and awarded Lehmann 4,000 euros as a fictional license fee (the value the YouTuber would have owed had he legally used Lehmann's actual voice), plus interest.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Germany
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Human or fundamental rights, Reputational
Failure modes
Voice clone
Consequences
Fine or settlement, Litigation
AI systems
AI voice cloning software
Regulations
GDPR (cited)

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident