Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-27481
Well documentedThree or more independent publishers report the core facts.

Child Safety Features on Major Social Media Platforms Fail in Testing

Researchers testing 86 child safety features across TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube found that only 40% worked as advertised and were realistically usable by children. The platforms enabled bullying, exploitation and eating disorder promotion. Meta faces lawsuits alleging intentional harm to young users.

29 June 2026 ยท TikTok ยท Safety and wellbeing
29 June 2026
AII-1000-274816 sources โ†“
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
United States
Source
CNN International
Date
29 June 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Researchers at the Cybersafety Research Center, a joint initiative from New York University and Northeastern University, tested 86 youth safety features across TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube.

Only 35 of 86 featuresโ€”just over 40%โ€”successfully met both criteria of working as described and being realistically findable and usable by children. Many safety tools appeared to be missing, broken, easily circumvented or difficult to find.

Examples included Snapchat allowing adults to send message requests to children they did not know, Instagram prompting teen accounts to connect with unknown men, and TikTok recommending searches to teen accounts such as 'how to pretend to eat your food' after promising to remove eating disorder content.

Reported impact

The platforms have enabled adolescent loneliness, bullying and sexual exploitation. The report states that harms to children 'are not hypothetical, and that when they do occur the consequences can be irreversible.'

The findings revealed a gulf between the companies' assurances about child safety and the experience of parents and teens online.

Index analysis

The four companies largely disputed the report's findings, arguing that their features work as intended or that the tests did not represent typical use of the platforms by kids and teens. The companies say they have made their products safer over the years, pointing to parental controls and time limits.

Researchers found that company language about the features often implied greater protective measures than actually existed, using statements like 'We make it difficult' or 'We have measures to protect against this' without describing those measures.

Governance controls

All four companies face thousands of lawsuits with similar claims about harms to young users, which they have disputed. Meta was found liable this year of intentionally addicting and harming young people.

Several countries have announced bans on social media for children under 16, and several tech leaders are set to testify to Congress about their apps' effects on children.

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Psychological, Public interest, Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
Children, Consumers
Failure modes
Content moderation failure, Unsafe recommendation
Consequences
Litigation

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

CNN International
More than half of social media child safety features aren't working as advertised, new research finds
29 June 2026
The New York Times
Many Child Safety Features on Social Apps Don't Work, Report Finds
29 June 2026
Digital Trends
TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube are failing kids with broken safety features, research finds
30 June 2026
GameReactor
Report claims that half of the social media child safety features don't work
30 June 2026
WebProNews
Social Media Safety Features Fail Children as Lawsuits Mount and Nations Impose Bans
30 June 2026
WMUR9
New research finds most social media youth safety tools fall short
1 July 2026