ChatGPT gave incorrect legal advice in Landshut police matter
ChatGPT provided incorrect legal advice to a woman in Landshut, Germany, falsely informing her that a store had unlawfully ejected her after she damaged property and tried to return multiple packages with a single label. Police responded and clarified the actual legal situation, confirming that the store's actions were lawful.
What happened
A 23-year-old woman attempted to return multiple packages at a postal service point in Landshut using only one return label. Staff explained that only one package could be accepted with the label.
The woman became angry and damaged a piggy bank on the counter. Staff then asked her to leave the store.
She consulted ChatGPT asking whether she had been wrongfully ejected and whether the staff should apologize. ChatGPT confirmed her view and stated the ejection was unlawful and that she was entitled to an apology.
The woman called police to enforce what she believed was her legal right. Police officers educated her on the actual legal situation and upheld the store's ban on her entry.
Reported impact
The incident resulted in a police response and officer time spent addressing the matter in Landshut.
Index analysis
ChatGPT provided incorrect legal guidance about the lawfulness of the store's decision to ask the customer to leave, failing to accurately assess the property rights and obligations of the business.
Classification
Sources and evidence
Sources not yet published
This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.