Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-01973
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Anthropic settled copyright lawsuit over book scanning for AI training

Anthropic settled a $1.5 billion copyright lawsuit brought by book authors after court filings revealed the company had conducted a secret project to destructively scan millions of books for AI training data. The filings show Anthropic acquired and scanned books without permission, including through pirated copies, and court documents indicated other major AI companies used similar practices.

August 2024 Β· Anthropic Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
August 2024
AII-1001-019733 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
United States
Source
Washington Post
Date
August 2024
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

In early 2024, Anthropic executives ramped up an internal project called Project Panama, described in planning documents as "our effort to destructively scan all the books in the world," with a note stating "We don't want it to be known that we are working on this."

Within about a year, according to legal filings, Anthropic spent tens of millions of dollars to acquire and slice the spines off millions of books, then scanned their pages to feed into the AI models behind Claude.

Court filings allege that Anthropic, Meta and other companies acquired books in bulk without authors' knowledge, including by downloading pirated copies, rather than seeking direct permission from publishers and authors.

Reported impact

The practices harmed book authors whose copyrighted works were used for AI training without permission.

Index analysis

The incident reflects a pattern across major AI companies to acquire large datasets without direct authorization from copyright holders, as shown in filings across multiple copyright lawsuits against Anthropic, Meta, Google and OpenAI.

Governance controls

Anthropic paid $1.5 billion to settle the copyright lawsuit brought by book authors in August 2025.

Court documents revealed that Meta employees had raised internal concerns about the copyright violations, and the practice was approved after escalation to CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property
Failure modes
Training data misuse, Unauthorised scraping
Consequences
Fine or settlement, Litigation
AI systems
Claude

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Washington Post
Inside one company's secret plan to 'destructively scan every book in the world'
27 January 2026
The Boston Globe
Inside a tech company's secretive plan to destroy millions of books
27 January 2026
Anchorage Daily News
How Silicon Valley built AI: Buying, scanning and discarding millions of books
28 January 2026
Oct 2026Carlsen Verlag sues OpenAI for copyright infringement of "Das NEINhorn"AllegedIntellectual property and appropriationSpiegel OnlineRP OnlineBΓΆrsenblatt+5Oct 2026Argentine media group Perfil sues OpenAI and Microsoft over unauthorized content useAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationPerfilClarinOct 2026Sony and Warner Sue Anthropic Over Unauthorized Training on Copyrighted MusicAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationΠ£ΠšΠ Π†ΠΠ€ΠžΠ ΠœSep 2026Biologist alleges Claude AI used unpublished research in enzyme discoveryAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationAnadolu AjansΔ±CumhuriyetHaberler+1Sep 2026Mathematician Accuses OpenAI of Using Unpublished Research in Model TrainingAllegedIntellectual property and appropriationThe VergeCybernewsQuartz+2