Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-06137
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

Alabama Attorneys Sanctioned for Fabricated ChatGPT Citations in Prison Case

Three attorneys at Butler Snow admitted to using ChatGPT to generate fabricated citations in legal filings for the Alabama Department of Corrections. A federal judge disqualified them from the case, issued a public reprimand, and ordered them to notify all clients and courts of the sanctionable misconduct.

24 July 2025 Β· Butler Snow Β· Reliability and hallucination
24 July 2025
AII-1002-061375 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
United States
Source
Reuters
Date
24 July 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Three attorneys from Butler Snowβ€”Matthew Reeves, William Cranford, and William Lunsfordβ€”used ChatGPT to generate citations in a motion filed on behalf of the Alabama Department of Corrections in a case involving an inmate who had been stabbed multiple times. The inmate objected to the timing of a proposed deposition and alleged that the Corrections filing "appears to have fabricated citations to legal authority in his motion for leave, 'possibly through the use of generative artificial intelligence.'"

The attorneys admitted in writing and at a hearing that the citations were generated by ChatGPT. Some citations did not exist, while others referenced a case from 1939 unrelated to the plaintiff's case, or a case that existed but in a different style than cited.

Reported impact

Judge Anna Manasco issued a 51-page order finding that the lawyers' misconduct wrought waste and harm. The court rejected arguments that the conduct caused no real damage because the underlying legal propositions were correct, stating that to accept such reasoning would "amplify the siren call of unverified AI for lawyers who are already confident in their legal conclusion."

Index analysis

ChatGPT hallucinated fake legal citations, a pattern the court described as the "wrong case, right law" phenomenon where algorithms invent fake case captions to support otherwise correct statements of law.

Governance controls

Judge Manasco disqualified all three attorneys from the case and imposed a public reprimand. The court ordered them to provide a copy of the order to all clients, opposing counsel, judges in every pending case in which they are counsel of record, and every attorney in their law firm within ten days, and to certify compliance within twenty-four hours. The court also referred the attorneys to the state bar association.

Classification

Category
Reliability and hallucination
Industry
Government, security and defence
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Reputational, Public interest
Failure modes
Hallucination, Fabricated citation
AI systems
ChatGPT

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Reuters
Judge disqualifies three Butler Snow attorneys from case over AI citations
24 July 2025
Above the Law
Court Kicks Lawyers Off Case After Finding Fake AI Cases In Filings - Above the Law
24 July 2025
WHNT.com
Huntsville lawyers sanctioned by judge, removed from prison lawsuit for use of AI
24 July 2025
Court House News Service
Attorney sanctions in Alabama demonstrate perils of AI
24 July 2025
U.S. News & World Report
Judge Sanctions Lawyers Defending Alabama's Prison System for Using Fake ChatGPT Cases in Filings
24 July 2025