Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-54569
Well documentedThree or more independent publishers report the core facts.Supporting sources are pending verification.

AI-powered brand protection software causes itch.io domain takedown

BrandShield's AI-powered brand protection software, deployed by Funko, filed phishing reports that caused itch.io's domain to be temporarily disabled. The domain registrar took the site offline without reviewing itch.io's response, though BrandShield maintained the AI had correctly identified infringing trademark content.

9 December 2024 Β· BrandShield Β· Intellectual property and appropriation
9 December 2024
AII-1002-54569
Quick facts
Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Country
United States
Date
9 December 2024
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

BrandShield, an AI-powered brand protection software used by Funko, filed phishing and fraud reports against itch.io to the site's domain registrar iWantMyName and hosting provider.

The domain registrar disabled itch.io's domain without reviewing itch.io's response to the report, taking the site offline temporarily. BrandShield claimed the AI correctly identified infringing Funko intellectual property on the site, but itch.io characterized the phishing report as bogus.

Reported impact

Itch.io, a platform where indie game developers can self-publish and set their own revenue share with the platform, was taken offline temporarily until the company contacted its domain registrar.

Index analysis

BrandShield used automated AI technology to identify unauthorized use of the Funko trademark and escalated the matter through phishing and fraud reports rather than the standard DMCA process, which would have allowed itch.io to review and remove content without losing domain access.

Governance controls

BrandShield's aggressive reporting tactic bypassed standard intellectual property dispute procedures. After the incident, BrandShield requested Gizmodo remove the word 'trash' from its article as defamatory, and Itch.io's employee clarified that Funko was likely not the malicious actor.

Classification

Category
Intellectual property and appropriation
Industry
Digital security
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Economic or property, Reputational
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Hallucination, Misidentification
Consequences
System suspension or termination
AI systems
BrandShield AI-powered brand protection software

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident