Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-19073
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.Supporting sources are pending verification.

AI-generated video spreads false claim of Chongqing bridge collapse

An AI-generated video falsely claiming a Chongqing bridge collapsed was posted online in March 2026, causing public confusion despite the creator's disclosure that it was AI-generated. Official authorities confirmed no such overpass exists and no collapse occurred, and police began investigating the user who spread the misinformation.

8 March 2026 Β· Chongqing Emergency Management Bureau Β· Misinformation and synthetic media
8 March 2026
AII-1001-19073
Quick facts
Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Country
China
Date
8 March 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

On March 8, 2026, a user posted a video on an internet platform claiming that the 'Nanan Overpass' in Chongqing had collapsed, drawing widespread attention.

The video creator stated the content was AI-generated, but the false information still caused some viewers to misunderstand, with commenters claiming they saw road signs showing Chongqing and believing a bridge collapse had occurred.

Reported impact

The false video caused public confusion and misunderstanding among some viewers who commented that they believed a bridge collapse had actually happened in Chongqing based on the content.

Index analysis

According to the Generative Artificial Intelligence Service Management Interim Measures, the use of generative AI services must comply with laws and regulations, respect social morality and ethics, and must not generate false and harmful information.

Governance controls

The Chongqing Emergency Management Bureau and Nanan District authorities confirmed that there is no overpass named 'Nanan Overpass' in Nanan District and that no bridge collapse incident has occurred in Chongqing recently.

Police are investigating the user who spread the misinformation.

Classification

Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
China
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Public interest
Harmed
General public
Failure modes
Deepfake video
Consequences
Police investigation, Regulatory investigation
AI systems
Generative AI service
Regulations
EU AI Act (cited)

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident