AI-Generated Photo Wins Photography Contest Before Being Disqualified in China
An AI-generated photograph reportedly won first place in a hotel chain's photography competition in China, deceiving five professional judges. When exposed through social media scrutiny, the organiser replaced the winning image without providing official explanation.
What happened
On January 9, 2026, a social media post alleged that entry #42, titled 'Old Light of Arcades' (ใ้ชๆฅผๆงๅ ใ), had won first place in the 'Art MaxXยทCity Memory Photography Competition' organised by Huazhu Group's premium hotel brand. The competition featured five professional judges including association vice-chairs.
When the image's exposure was increased for closer inspection, it displayed characteristic AI-generation errors: distorted and incomplete characters on signage on the right side, unnatural connections between the elderly man's fingers and hand holding a birdcage, and other anomalies typical of AI-generated images.
On January 10, 2026, the organiser replaced the first-place photograph with the previously second-place entry, 'Lujiazui' (ใ้ๅฎถๅดใ). As of the report date, the organiser had not provided an official response regarding the AI-generation allegation.
Reported impact
The incident sparked widespread attention and discussion on social media regarding the judges' ability to distinguish AI-generated images from authentic photographs in a professional competition context.
Index analysis
The competition's evaluation process involved initial screening by the organiser from approximately 90 submissions, followed by final review by five professional judges. The image passed both stages despite visible flaws characteristic of AI generation when examined closely.
Governance controls
The organiser did not disclose whether the submission violated competition rules requiring original work, or how an AI-generated entry was not identified during the initial screening stage.
Classification
Sources and evidence
Sources not yet published
This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.