Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-50129
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.Supporting sources are pending verification.

AI-Generated Disturbing Videos Harm Children's Mental Health in China

AI-generated disturbing videos featuring bizarre character combinations and violent or sexual content have become popular among Chinese schoolchildren through short video platforms. Parents report children become obsessed with the content, and psychological experts warn that prolonged exposure may damage children's attention capacity and distort their understanding of traditional culture.

22 November 2025 Β· Short video platforms in China Β· Harmful and abusive content
22 November 2025
AII-1001-50129
Quick facts
Category
Harmful and abusive content
Country
China
Date
22 November 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

AI-generated videos known as '倖国山桷经' (foreign Shanhaijing) and 'AIι‚ͺε…Έ' (AI obscene content) have become popular among Chinese elementary school children. These videos feature bizarre, AI-generated character combinations with violent and bloody content, including images of mutilation, eye-gouging, and disturbing remakes of classic characters such as Ultraman depicted as pregnant or Pinocchio hitting someone. Users can easily create such videos by submitting basic character images, text descriptions, and instructions to common AI video websites.

Short video platforms continuously recommend disturbing content to children despite user attempts to report videos or mark them as disliked. According to a former video company employee, hundreds of video accounts under a major platform have persistently promoted such 'obscene animations' by applying AI generation technology to classic animated characters. The videos use bright colors to attract children and employ algorithmic recommendation to create a distribution feedback loop.

Reported impact

Parents report that children have become obsessed with these videos, repeatedly speaking mysterious words from the content and showing signs of being 'possessed.' A child in Guangdong province was frequently exposed to disturbing animated videos after watching legitimate cartoons and animation. According to psychological consultants, prolonged exposure to such high-stimulation, low-density 'electronic junk food' may cause fragmentation of adolescents' attention mechanisms and weaken the brain's capacity for deep reading and logical thinking.

Children reportedly develop distorted views of traditional culture. Long-term viewing of such 'cybernetic Shanhaijing' may cause children to associate the classical text with crude, distorted content rather than its actual cultural significance. The phenomena has extended to commercial products, with merchandise featuring these characters sold on e-commerce platforms, reportedly creating social pressure and hidden competition among children.

Index analysis

The content bypasses platform moderation systems by using keyword substitution to generate inappropriate 'second-dimension' style images with sexual undertones and other harmful elements, including depictions of child pregnancy. AI modification packages such visual content as 'creative innovation' while degrading classic literature and traditional culture, potentially embedding the false belief in young minds that classics can be arbitrarily deconstructed.

Governance controls

Platforms lack effective mechanisms to prevent the continuous promotion of harmful content to minors even after users report videos or indicate disinterest. The current moderation and recommendation systems fail to stop the algorithmic promotion loop that amplifies exposure to disturbing content.

Classification

Category
Harmful and abusive content
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
China
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Psychological, Public interest
Harmed
Children
Failure modes
Manipulation or dark pattern, Content moderation failure
AI systems
AI image generation tools, AI video generation tools, Platform recommendation algorithms

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident