Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1000-35307
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.Supporting sources are pending verification.

AI-Generated Campaign Ads in New York Governor's Race

Republican gubernatorial candidate Bruce Blakeman released at least 17 AI-generated campaign videos depicting opponent Gov. Kathy Hochul and NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani in false scenarios, describing them as political satire. Hochul's campaign called the ads 'straight up lying,' while voters and experts raised concerns about misleading content and fabricated speech, though no laws in New York ban such AI use in campaigns.

22 July 2026 Β· Bruce Blakeman Β· Misinformation and synthetic media
22 July 2026
AII-1000-35307
Quick facts
Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Country
United States
Date
22 July 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Bruce Blakeman, Republican candidate for New York governor and Nassau County executive, released AI-generated campaign videos during his race against Democratic incumbent Gov. Kathy Hochul. Newsday identified at least 17 videos posted between January 1 and July 17, 2026, containing AI-generated content depicting Hochul and NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani as fictional characters, thieves, movers, and basketball players.

In one AI-generated ad, a fake Hochul says her administration raised taxes for 'programs that matter, like free healthcare for sex workers.' In another, fabricated figures including a made-up drug dealer, an undocumented immigrant, and an energy CEO express support for Hochul. Blakeman characterized the videos as political satire and humor.

Reported impact

Hochul's campaign called the ads 'straight up lying' and responded with messaging branding Blakeman as 'Fakeman.' Voter Kylie Berg said the ads were 'misleading because it makes people think they have certain ideas' and accused Blakeman of using 'AI to trick people,' while another voter, Brett Topel, stated 'the ads should be authentic.'

Index analysis

Columbia University political science professor Yamil Velez said fooling the electorate was not the intent with AI-generated ads, noting that what matters is whether an ad resonates emotionally. Political consultant Michael Dawidziak noted that both satire and political speech are often deemed protected speech, with the Supreme Court frequently ruling in favor of political speech protection.

Experts said the low-cost tool is not more effective than typical negative campaigning with real people and risks inundating voters with 'AI slop'β€”low-quality imagery easily identified as fabricated. New York has no laws banning AI use in campaign ads.

Classification

Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
United States
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Public interest, Reputational
Harmed
General public
Failure modes
Deepfake video, Manipulation or dark pattern
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
Generative AI campaign video system

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident