Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-85467
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.Supporting sources are pending verification.

AI-Generated Audio Attributed to Argentine Deputy Chamber President Sparks Political Dispute

Synthetic audio featuring a cloned voice attributed to Argentine Deputy Chamber President Martín Menem circulated during a parliamentary debate in March 2025, purportedly capturing instructions for legislators to act aggressively. Menem denied the audios' authenticity and attributed them to AI-generation, while fellow deputy Marcela Pagano contested his denial and claimed multiple people received the genuine messages.

19 March 2025 · Martín Menem · Misinformation and synthetic media
19 March 2025
AII-1001-85467
Quick facts
Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Country
Argentina
Date
19 March 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Audios featuring a voice attributed to Martín Menem, president of the Argentine Chamber of Deputies, circulated during a parliamentary debate on a decree regarding an IMF agreement in March 2025. According to the purported audios, the voice instructed La Libertad Avanza legislators to act aggressively in the chamber, stating 'Pero griten. Ténganlos siempre, en todo momento. Pero los quiero gritándome, a los gritos, puteando. Nada de algo pacífico, eh.'

Menem denied the audios were authentic and attributed their creation to artificial intelligence. He stated 'El audio no es verdadero' and 'Hay mucha inteligencia artificial atrás.' Menem also claimed his son listened to the audio and told him 'papá, esa no es tu voz.'

Reported impact

The audios triggered controversy during the parliamentary session and drew a demand for explanations from German Martínez, head of the Unión por la Patria bloc. Deputy Marcela Pagano challenged Menem's denial, stating that multiple people received the messages and offering to submit her phone to judicial examination for verification.

Index analysis

The dispute reflects broader concerns about AI-generated synthetic audio's potential to fabricate statements by political figures during sensitive legislative moments. Pagano's counter-claim suggested the audios were genuine and questioned why Menem would not submit his own phone for forensic examination.

Classification

Category
Misinformation and synthetic media
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Argentina
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Public interest, Reputational
Harmed
Government
Failure modes
Voice clone
Consequences
None recorded
AI systems
Unidentified AI voice cloning system

Sources and evidence

Sources not yet published

This record was researched and written by the Index from original reporting. Its sources are still being verified by an editor, and they are listed here once that check is complete. Until then the record carries no reviewer.

How sources are verifiedSuggest a source for this incident