Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-52011
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.

AI-generated anti-immigrant and sexualized content spreads on TikTok

Researchers found over 350 TikTok accounts posting billions of views of AI-generated content, including anti-immigrant material and sexualized imagery of minors, with inadequate labeling and moderation by the platform. The accounts used automated posting patterns to spread the content widely while evading detection for extended periods.

December 2025 Β· TikTok Β· Harmful and abusive content
December 2025
AII-1001-520112 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Harmful and abusive content
Country
Australia
Source
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Date
December 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Researchers from AI Forensics uncovered 354 AI-focused accounts on TikTok that had accumulated 4.5 billion views over a month-long period in 2025, posting 43,000 pieces of AI-generated content.

Some of the accounts posted up to 70 times a day, with most accounts launched at the beginning of the year, indicating automated posting designed to game TikTok's recommendation algorithm. Content included anti-immigrant material, fake broadcast news segments with anti-immigrant narratives, and sexualized content featuring female bodies including girls that appeared to be underage.

AI Forensics found that half of the content posted by these accounts was not labeled as AI-generated, and less than 2% carried TikTok's official AI content label. Some accounts escaped TikTok's moderation for months despite posting content that violated the platform's terms of service.

Reported impact

The AI-generated content, including fake news segments using known broadcasting brands such as Sky News and ABC, reached billions of users on the platform and could mislead viewers about its origins.

Content sexualizing female bodies, including apparent minors, was widely distributed on the platform without proper moderation.

Index analysis

The incident reflects gaps in TikTok's content moderation systems, which failed to consistently catch and remove violative content despite it being posted repeatedly from automated accounts over extended periods.

The low rate of AI labeling on the platformβ€”less than 2% in these accounts despite TikTok's availability of an AI labelβ€”enabled deceptive presentation of generated content as authentic material.

Governance controls

TikTok said the report's claims were "unsubstantiated" and stated the researchers had singled it out for an issue affecting multiple platforms. The platform offers users an option to reduce the amount of AI content they see.

Some of the posts were taken down by TikTok after being referred to the platform by the Guardian, and dozens of the accounts identified in the study were subsequently deleted, indicating moderator action.

Classification

Category
Harmful and abusive content
Industry
Media, social platforms and marketing
Country
Australia
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unknown
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Public interest, Reputational, Human or fundamental rights
Harmed
General public, Children, Women
Failure modes
Content moderation failure, Manipulation or dark pattern
AI systems
TikTok recommendation algorithm

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Tech companies advised to label AI-generated content
30 November 2025
The Guardian
Anti-immigrant material among AI-generated content getting billions of views on TikTok
3 December 2025