Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-48887
ReportedReported by fewer than three independent publishers, with no official finding.

AI detection tools flag neurodivergent and ESL students' work as AI-generated

AI detection tools used in academic settings have reportedly misidentified writing by neurodivergent and ESL students as AI-generated, resulting in false cheating accusations. A student with autism spectrum disorder at Central Methodist University received a zero grade that was later reversed, though she faced a warning about future flagging, while independent testing found these tools falsely flag 1-2% of human-written essays.", <parameter name="event_date">2023-09

18 October 2024 Β· Central Methodist University Β· Discrimination and fairness
18 October 2024
AII-1002-48887View source β†—
Quick facts
Category
Discrimination and fairness
Country
United States
Source
bloomberg.com
Date
18 October 2024
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

Moira Olmsted, a student with autism spectrum disorder at Central Methodist University, submitted a written assignment in fall 2023 and received a zero grade after an AI detection tool flagged her work as likely AI-generated. Olmsted disputed the accusation, noting that she has autism and writes in a formulaic manner that might be mistaken for AI-generated text.

Bloomberg Businessweek tested two leading AI detection services, GPTZero and Copyleaks, on 500 college application essays from Texas A&M University submitted in summer 2022, before ChatGPT's release. The testing found that the services falsely flagged 1% to 2% of the essays as likely written by AI.

Reported impact

Olmsted's grade was ultimately changed after she disputed the accusation, but she received a strict warning that any future flagging would be treated as plagiarism, creating a threat to her academic standing. Olmsted described the accusation as a 'punch in the gut.'

Index analysis

About two-thirds of teachers report using AI checkers regularly, according to a survey of more than 450 instructors published in March 2024 by the Center for Democracy & Technology. The best AI writing detectors are described as highly accurate but not foolproof.

Classification

Category
Discrimination and fairness
Industry
Education and training
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Reputational, Psychological
Failure modes
Misidentification
AI systems
GPTZero, Copyleaks

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

bloomberg.com
AI detection tools flag neurodivergent and ESL students' work as AI-generated