Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-05657
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

AI chatbots give inaccurate health advice, Oxford study finds

Researchers at Oxford University tested AI chatbots including GPT-4o, Llama 3, and Command R+ on health scenarios with UK participants. The study found chatbots were no better than internet search engines at helping users identify health problems or determine whether medical care was needed.

9 February 2026 ยท OpenAI ยท Reliability and hallucination
9 February 2026
AII-1001-056575 sources โ†“
Quick facts
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
United Kingdom
Source
Toronto Sun
Date
9 February 2026
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A British-led team of researchers presented nearly 1,300 UK-based participants with 10 different health scenarios such as a headache after a night out drinking, a new mother feeling exhausted, or what having gallstones feels like. Participants were randomly assigned one of three AI chatbotsโ€”OpenAI's GPT-4o, Meta's Llama 3, or Command R+โ€”or a control group that used internet search engines.

People using AI chatbots identified their health problem around a third of the time, while only around 45 percent figured out the right course of action, no better than the control group using traditional internet search. The study, published in Nature Medicine, found a disparity between these results and how AI chatbots score highly on medical licensing exams.

Reported impact

Rebecca Payne from Oxford University stated that patients need to be aware that asking a large language model about their symptoms can be dangerous, giving wrong diagnoses and failing to recognise when urgent help is needed.

One out of every six US adults asks AI chatbots about health information at least once a month, with that number expected to increase as more people adopt the technology.

Index analysis

Researchers attributed the gap between AI chatbots' high performance on medical exams and their poor real-world performance to a communication breakdown. In simulated patient interactions used to test AI, humans typically provided all relevant information, whereas real humans often did not give chatbots all relevant information and sometimes struggled to interpret or misunderstood the chatbot's advice.

Classification

Category
Reliability and hallucination
Industry
Healthcare, drugs and biotechnology
Country
United Kingdom
Harm status
Potential harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm types
Public interest
Harmed
General public, Consumers
Failure modes
Hallucination
AI systems
GPT-4o, Llama 3, Command R+

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

Toronto Sun
AI chatbots give bad health advice, research finds
9 February 2026
Daily Mail Online
Relying on AI chatbots for health 'dangerous' as they give bad advice
9 February 2026
Daily Sabah
AI chatbots no better than traditional sources for health advice: Study
9 February 2026
The Gulf Today
Artificial Intelligence chatbots give bad health advice, reveals new research
9 February 2026
Narooma News
Not a real doctor: AI struggles to treat human patients
9 February 2026