Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1002-09359
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

AI-assisted colonoscopies linked to clinician deskilling and reduced detection without AI

A Polish study of over 1,400 colonoscopies found that endoscopists who routinely used AI assistance to detect precancerous growths experienced a significant decline in detection ability when AI was not available, dropping 6 percentage points and representing about 20% worse performance than before AI was introduced. Researchers attributed this 'deskilling' effect to over-reliance on the technology reducing clinician motivation and cognitive engagement.

12 August 2025 Β· Academy of Silesia Β· Safety and wellbeing
12 August 2025
AII-1002-093592 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Safety and wellbeing
Country
Poland
Source
MedPage Today
Date
12 August 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

A study of over 1,400 non-AI-assisted colonoscopies at four endoscopy centres in Poland found that the adenoma detection rate (ADR) dropped from 28.4% in the three months before AI assistance was introduced to 22.4% in the three months after, representing a 6 percentage point decline.

The 19 experienced endoscopists in the study, each having performed more than 2,000 colonoscopies, experienced a roughly 20 per cent reduction in ability to detect tumours when AI assistance was removed compared to rates before AI was introduced.

Reported impact

The decline in ADR for non-AI-assisted colonoscopies suggests clinician deskilling from routine reliance on AI. The researchers attributed this to over-reliance leading to reduced motivation, focus, and responsibility in cognitive decision-making without AI assistance.

Endoscopists who became accustomed to AI assistance showed weakened visual search habits, altered gaze patterns, dulled pattern recognition, and reduced diagnostic confidence when performing procedures without the technology, potentially affecting patient outcomes by missing precancerous lesions.

Index analysis

While AI-assisted colonoscopy overall raised the ADR from 22.4% to 25.3%, the masking effect obscured the significant decline in performance during non-AI procedures, suggesting the apparent benefit of AI may partly reflect degradation in unassisted performance rather than genuine improvement.

The researchers compared this phenomenon to the 'Google Maps effect', where continuous reliance on decision support systems leads to atrophy of underlying skills and diminished ability to function when the tool is unavailable.

Classification

Category
Safety and wellbeing
Industry
Healthcare, drugs and biotechnology
Country
Poland
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harmed
Consumers
Failure modes
Overreliance
AI systems
AI adenoma detection system for colonoscopy

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

MedPage Today
Relying on AI in Colonoscopies May Erode Clinicians' Skills
12 August 2025
straitstimes.com
AI-assisted colonoscopies linked to clinician deskilling and reduced detection without AI