Skip to content
Submit incident
AII-1001-89469
ConfirmedA court, a regulator or the organization itself has stated the core facts, or the record cites a court or regulator source.

$31,000 sanction for AI-generated false citations in Lacey v. State Farm brief

A Special Master in a California federal court sanctioned two law firms $31,000 for submitting a brief containing approximately nine false legal citations and fabricated quotations generated by AI tools. An attorney at Ellis George created an AI-generated outline that was incorporated into the brief by K&L Gates without verification, and the firms failed to catch the errors even after the Special Master initially flagged two incorrect citations.

15 April 2025 Β· Ellis George Cipolla LLP Β· Reliability and hallucination
15 April 2025
AII-1001-894692 sources ↓
Quick facts
Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
United States
Source
reason.com
Date
15 April 2025
Drafted by
Raidu Incident Detection

What happened

An attorney at Ellis George Cipolla LLP used various AI tools to generate an outline for a supplemental brief in a discovery dispute in Lacey v. State Farm. The outline was passed to K&L Gates LLP, which incorporated it into the brief submitted to the Special Master without verification.

The brief contained approximately nine false, inaccurate, or misleading legal citations out of 27 total. At least two cited authorities did not exist, and several quotations were fabricated. The Special Master initially identified two erroneous citations and requested correction; the firms resubmitted the brief, but it retained AI-generated errors.

Reported impact

The Special Master issued orders on April 15 and 20 regarding the false citations and imposed sanctions combining litigation sanctions against the plaintiff and financial payments from the lawyers and law firms totaling $31,000.

Index analysis

The lawyers' declarations revealed that the source of the errors was inappropriate use of and reliance on AI tools. The attorney at Ellis George who created the outline candidly admitted responsibility and expressed remorse; K&L Gates attorneys were unaware the outline contained AI-generated research.

Governance controls

The court noted that both firms have excellent reputations and that this error is not characteristic of their work. The Special Master concluded that additional financial or disciplinary sanctions against the individual attorneys were not warranted, as the matter was properly resolved through the combined sanctions.

Classification

Category
Reliability and hallucination
Country
United States
Harm status
Actual harm
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Unknown
Harm types
Economic or property, Reputational
Harmed
Business
Failure modes
Hallucination, Fabricated citation, Overreliance
Consequences
Fine or settlement, Litigation
AI systems
unspecified AI tools

Sources and evidence

This record was researched and written by the Index, based on the following original reporting.

reason.com
$31,000 sanction for AI-generated false citations in Lacey v. State Farm brief
webpronews.com
$31,000 sanction for AI-generated false citations in Lacey v. State Farm brief